Humes v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 28, 2014
ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Order granting Plaintiff's application for attorney fees and costs. Plaintiff's fee application is reasonable and should be granted in its entirety. Plaintiff is hereby awarded from Hosto attorney's fees in the amount of $72,411.70 and costs in the amount of $2,107.99. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/28/2014. (jak)
|August 7, 2013
JUDGMENT pursuant to 2 Order it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Hosto, Buchan, Prater, & Lawrence violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692e or, alternatively, 15 U.S.C. § 1692f of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and is liable for 6;10,000 in actual damages, $1,000 in statutory damages, costs, and attorney's fees with respect to Plaintiff Shawn Michael Humes's non-core claims. Defendant LVNV Funding breached a modified contract with Humes. Hosto committed the to rts of fraud and misrepresentation. However, Humes is not entitled to additional damages based on these claims. Humes's remaining claims fail as a matter of law or are not supported by evidence. Humes's counsel will have fourteen days from the date of this Judgment to submit an application to the Bankruptcy Court, itemizing Humes's costs and attorney's fees. The Bankruptcy Court will then submit its review as a proposal to this Court to be added to the final Judgment, if accepted. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/7/2013. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?