Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Shelby County Health Care Corporation
Defendant: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Medford Farm Partnership, Aaron Medford and Barbara Ford
Case Number: 3:2013cv00194
Filed: August 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 187 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 175 Motion in Limine as set forth in this Order. 178 Motion in Limine is denied. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/7/2019. (jak) (Docket text modified on 2/7/2019 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 172 ORDER finding as moot in part and denying in part 154 Motion in Limine and granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 1/4/2019. (jak)
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER denying 130 Motion for Summary Judgment. 133 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants impaired the lien. However, the material facts remain in dispute regarding mitigation and damages. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 1/3/2019. (jak)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER: 102 is granted as it pertains to the Cross-Claim and denied as to the other requests. Ford's Cross-Motion is denied. Accordingly, Ford must provide indemnity to the Farm for any amount recovered by the Med. The Farm's prayers for dismissal of the Med's Complaint, that the lien to be declared invalid, and that the lien did not attach to the settlement proceeds are denied. Ford's 121 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/21/2018. (jak)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER denying 116 Motion to certify questions of law to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/9/2018. (jak)
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER denying 79 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 81 Motion for Attorney Fees. The previous orders awarding Defendants attorneys' fees and costs, 40 & 63 , are vacated. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/12/2015. (jak)
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 78 JUDGMENT based on the 77 Order, this case is dismissed. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/19/2015. (jak)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Stay. Accordingly, upon the posting of supersedeas bond in the amount of $11,920.42, the Judgment is stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/3/2014. (jak)
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 60 Motion for Attorney Fees. Accordingly, Defendants are entitled to $6,003.00 in attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 8/1/2014. (jak)
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 JUDGMENT in accordance with 57 Order, Judgment is hereby entered dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/9/2014. (jak)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting in part 34 Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs. Accordingly, Defendant Ford is entitled to $5,740.00 in attorney's fees and $164.19 in costs, for a total of $5,904.19, from Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/14/2014. (jak)
April 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/10/2014. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby County Health Care Corporation
Represented By: Curtis Henry Goetsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medford Farm Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Medford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?