Hathcock v. BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff: Jason Hathcock
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv00230
Filed: October 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 151
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AMENDED ORDER granting 9 Motion to Transfer Case. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case immediately to the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/24/2014. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hathcock v. BNSF Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Barry Deacon
Represented By: Jason Mark Milne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Hathcock
Represented By: Chester H. Lauck, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?