Butler v. Does
Mark A Butler, Derick Stevenson and Clinton Robinson |
Does |
3:2014cv00030 |
February 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Craighead |
Kristine G. Baker |
Joe J. Volpe |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 JUDGMENT consistent with 62 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/2/2015. (jak) |
Filing 50 ORDER adopting 17 Proposed Partial Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. The claims of co-plaintiffs Stevenson and Robinson are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs' legal mail allegations are also dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/4/2014. (jak) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing the Clerk to mail Plaintiff an Application to Proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit and calculation sheet. Plaintiff is directed to submit the $400 filing fee or submit a proper and complete Application. The Clerk shal l mail Plaintiff a 1983 Complaint form for plaintiff to complete if he so desires within thirty days of the date of this Order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Craighead County Detention Facility. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/5/2014. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.