Pekin Insurance Company v. Correct Roofing & Construction Inc et al
| Pekin Insurance Company |
| Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Correct Roofing & Construction Inc, George L Walker, Michelle E Rains, Nichole L Johnson and Rosia Turner |
| 3:2014cv00135 |
| May 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Out of State |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
JUDGMENT consistent with 86 Order, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/17/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 70 Motion for Disbursement. Accordingly, the clerk is directed to make payment of $1,700,000, plus any applicable interest of the account, to the "Bobby McDaniel Client Trust Account," to be divided equally between Rains and Turner. Additionally, Pekin's 64 Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/11/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 50 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Accordingly, the clerk is directed to make payment of $100,000, plus any applicable interest of the account, to the "Robert J. Napleton Client Trust Account." Additionally, Pekin's 55 Motion to Dismiss Shelby County Healthcare Corporation is granted. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/16/2014. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
