In Re: Kinder Morgan Marine Services LLC
Claimant: Benjamin Quick
Case Number: 3:2015cv00007
Filed: January 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Mississippi
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 688
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/27/2016. (jak)
April 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER: Motion, 13 , granted. Kinder Morgan's request to stay, 23 , is granted. This case is stayed pending resolution of Benjamin Quick v. Kinder Morgan Marine Services, LLC, Case No. CV 2014-137 (JF). Kinder Morgan must file a status report by 1 October 2015, and every six months thereafter, about the status of the state case. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/27/2015. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Kinder Morgan Marine Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Benjamin Quick
Represented By: Paul W. Johnson
Represented By: Chester H. Lauck, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?