Addison v. Mills et al
| Nicholas Cortez Addison |
| Larry Mills, Joey Martin and Jane Does |
| 3:2015cv00086 |
| April 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Poinsett |
| Beth Deere |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
JUDGMENT consistent with 72 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 3/14/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety 40 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. Addison's claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/26/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 19 Motion to dismiss. Mr. Addison's claims against Defendant Mills are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/4/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
4
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS. Denying 1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to enclose an IFP Application along with a copy of this Order and mail them to the Plaintiff. Plaintiff must return a completed IFP application or pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/2/2015. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
