Nettles v. Hytrol Conveyor Company

Plaintiff: Leisa Nettles
Defendant: Hytrol Conveyor Company
Case Number: 3:2015cv00123
Filed: May 5, 2015
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Craighead
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 9, 2016 45 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT pursuant to 44 Order, the Court grants defendant Hytrol Conveyer Company, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment, 17 . Plaintiff Leisa Nettles' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/9/2016. (jak)
November 12, 2015 15 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/12/2015. (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nettles v. Hytrol Conveyor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leisa Nettles
Represented By: Lucien Ramseur Gillham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hytrol Conveyor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?