Johnson v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al
| Gary E Johnson |
| Jonesboro Arkansas, City of, Harold Perrin, John Street, L M Duncan, Dianne Street, Lenders Title Company, Bob Gibson, Garver Engineering and Does |
| 3:2015cv00136 |
| May 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT pursuant to 36 Order, Gary E. Johnson's complaint is hereby dismissed so that he can pursue his claims in the Circuit Court of Craighead County, Arkansas. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/24/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER giving notice to Gary E. Johnson that he must file a response to the pending motions on or before August 14, 2015, or the Court will assume that the motions are uncontested and will act accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/4/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER directing plaintiff's attention to that that plaintiff is required to be familiar and comply with all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to so comply can result in dismissal of plaintiff's claim. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve this Order on plaintiff by both regular mail and certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/29/2015. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
