Patterson v. Stein et al
| Antonio Patterson |
| John H Stein, Jr, Larry W Winkler and Smith Transportation Inc |
| 3:2015cv00207 |
| July 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Out of State |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 48 MOTION to Continue. This case will be removed from the trial calendar for the week of September 19, 2016. An Amended Final Scheduling Order, along with a new trial date, will be entered by separate Order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/29/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Dismiss Party. Mr. Patterson failed to state a claim against Mr. Winkler and failed to allege sufficient facts establishing that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Mr. Winkler. Therefore, the Coach grants Mr. Winkler's motion to dismiss Mr. Patterson's claims against him. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/16/2016 (jak)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting Motion to Consolidate cases. The Patterson case, 3:15-cv-00207, shall be consolidated with and into the Stringer case, 3:14-cv-00151. All parties are directed to make filings only in Stringer v. Smith Transportation, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-00151-KGB, going forward. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/27/2015. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
