London et al v. Beck et al
Jerrick Lamont London, K Abrem and Steven Hunter |
Ron Beck, Jeremy Sparks, Pate, Gerald Stipank, Yang, Care McFerlen, Henson, Steven Wade and Ray |
3:2015cv00330 |
October 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Mississippi |
J. Leon Holmes |
Joe J. Volpe |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration. Judgment has already been entered in this case. London's claims were dismissed at his own request and he has stated no reason for the Court to reconsider that Order. If he wishes to pursue his claims, he will need to commence a new case. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/7/2016. (jak) |
Filing 9 ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiffs K. Abrem and Steven Hunter are dismissed without prejudice for failure to submit a completed IFP Applicatio n or their shares of the statutory filing fee. Plaintiff Jerrick London's claims were dismissed without prejudice on December 21, 2015. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/22/2015. (jak) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting 7 Motion. Jerrick Lamont London's claims in this action are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/21/2015. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.