Sims v. King

Plaintiff: Harold Shawgressy Sims
Defendant: King
Case Number: 3:2016cv00016
Filed: January 19, 2016
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Craighead
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 16, 2016 13 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: Sims's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/16/2016. (jak)
January 25, 2016 2 Opinion or Order of the Court INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS. Plaintiff is directed to file an IFP Motion or pay the $400 filing fee on or before February 25, 2016. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an IFP Application, along with a prison calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 1/25/2016. (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sims v. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harold Shawgressy Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?