Clayton v. Craighead County Detention Center
| Bobby Ray Clayton |
| Scott Dacus, Andy Allison, Matt Hall and J Hicks |
| 3:2016cv00017 |
| January 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| Beth Deere |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT: The amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/11/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: To date, the Defendants have not notified the Court as to whether Mr. Clayton complied with the May 5 Order. Defendants have seven days to notify the Court as to whether they intend to pursue their motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/13/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER dismissing Craighead County Detention Center as a Defendant. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the docket sheet to reflect this change. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/11/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS. The Clerk of Court is directed to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff must return a completed IFP Application including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $400 filing fee within thirty days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/25/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
