McQuay v. Hall et al
| Steven Alex McQuay |
| Matthew Hall and Ballard |
| 3:2016cv00078 |
| March 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 26 order entered on this day, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/23/2016. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting 6 Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects. Defendant Matthew Hall is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/28/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the USM to serve Defendant Ballard without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/24/2016. (lej)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER that Plaintiff must submit either (1) the statutory filing fee of $400; or (2) a properly completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official of the detention center at which he is confined within 30 days of the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/8/2016. (lej)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
