Jones v. Boykins et al
| Christopher Jones |
| D Boykins and Jerry Lung |
| 3:2016cv00083 |
| March 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Poinsett |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
JUDGMENT: Jones's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/5/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Jones's custodian must collect an initial partial filing fee of $1.49 from Jones's prison trust account and forward it along with future payments to the Clerk of the Court until t he total $350 is paid in full. The Court directs the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Sheriff of Poinsett County Detention Center. This case is stayed pending disposition of Jones's state case. Jones must file a motion to reopen t his case within sixty days of the final disposition of his state case, including any appeal. If he doesn't file a timely motion to reopen or a status report by 1 June 2017, then the Court will reopen the case and dismiss it without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/3/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
4
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/7/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
