Tri-State Armature & Electrical Works Inc v. Houston et al
| Tri-State Armature & Electrical Works Inc |
| Timothy B Houston, Electro Design Enginerring Inc and Celeta Stripling |
| 3:2016cv00134 |
| May 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Out of State |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER: The Court notes the parties' 87 Stipulation of dismissal. All claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/23/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER: With the help of Magistrate Judge Volpe, the parties have settled. Congratulations. The 58 Second Amended Final Scheduling Order is suspended. The Court looks forward to receiving the stipulation of dismissal of all claims against all parties by 10/10/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER: The Court can handle this dispute on the papers. The proposed joint letter is a good start, and the Court confirms its bench ruling that the letter should come from all counsel. It needs two tweaks and some additional information, though, to b e fair to EDE, Stripling, and Houston, who objected to these subpoenas. The Court could have, and should have, been clearer from the bench about the subpoenas. They're from Tri-State, not all the parties. Discovery disputes, 49 and 52 , addressed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/18/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER noting 49 Tri-State's report of discovery dispute. The Court directs Tri-State to review the Scheduling Order about discovery disputes, 15 at 3. The Court directs EDE, Stripling, and Houston to respond to 49 in a joint paper by 5/17 /2017, guided by the limitations in the Scheduling Order. After receiving that response, the Court will decide if a hearing is necessary. Counsel should also inform chambers if they're available for a 10:30 a.m. hearing in Jonesboro on 5/24/2017 if one is needed. 50 Motion granted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/11/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER addressing Joint Reports 22 & 28 . Simultaneous supplemental production, as approved on the record, due by 5/8/2017. 31 Motion to Amend is granted in part and denied in part. New defamation claims against new defendants would further comp licate an already tangled dispute. All other proposed amendments approved. Clean copy of the amended complaint, reflecting the Court's limitation, due by 4/14/2017. An Amended Final Scheduling Order will issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/7/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: If Tri-State hasn't served the disputed subpoenas yet, then it should not do so until the Court resolves the parties' dispute. Simultaneous five-page briefs with attachments due by 5:00 p.m. tomorrow, 3/1/2017. The Court encourages counsel to do two things: cooperate more; and follow the Court's 15 Scheduling Order, about how to bring discovery disputes to the Court. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/28/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
17
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/3/2017. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
