Oliver v. Cook et al
| Artez Oliver |
| Dell Cook, Andrew Harrison, Hicks and Luther Withfeild |
| 3:2016cv00174 |
| July 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Mississippi |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT pursuant to 20 Order, plaintiff Artez Oliver's claims against defendants Dale Cook, Andrew Harris, Captain Hicks, and Luther Whitfield, both in their official and individual capacities, are dismissed with prejudice 2 . The re lief sought by Mr. Oliver is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/15/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
18
JUDGMENT pursuant to 17 Order, Plaintiff's claims against Cook, Harris, Hicks, and Whitfield both in their official and individual capacities are dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought by Mr. Oliver is denied. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/12/2018. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
