Callies v. Crittenden County Detention Center
| Gary Callies |
| Crittenden County Detention Center |
| 3:2016cv00201 |
| August 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT consistent with 48 Order, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/12/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 46 Motion. Callies must file his objections on or before 7/10/2018. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/27/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Motion for Extension. Plaintiff must file his response to Defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 10/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/28/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER adopting the 20 Recommendation in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Callies may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against Myleo, Coleman, and Nurse Mandy in their individual capacities only. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Myleo, Coleman, and Nurse Mandy and forward it to the U.S. Marshal for service of the summons, substituted complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Callies's official claim against Myleo, Coleman, and Nurse Mandy is dismissed without prejudice. Callies's claim against the CCDC is dismissed with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/23/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 5 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk is directed to mail plaintiff a freeworld Application to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff must file on or before 11/16/2016 a statement indicating his desire to continue with this lawsuit and a signed and fully completed freeworld Application to Proceed IFP. If plaintiff does not timely and properly do so, this case will be dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/17/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS. Plaintiff is directed to either pay the $400 filing fee or file an IFP motion on or before 9/29/2016. The clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an IFP application, along with a prison calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 8/29/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Callies v. Crittenden County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gary Callies | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crittenden County Detention Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
