Addison v. Huckabee et al
| Nicholas Addison |
| Allison Huckabee, David Carter, D Crittenden, B Cagle, A Catterton, M Keller, R Smith and C Looney |
| 3:2016cv00233 |
| September 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Greene |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting 5 Recommendation and overruling Addison's 6 objections. Addison's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is denied; and his complaint and amended complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. If Addison wants to proce ed with this case, then he must pay the $400 filing and administrative fees and file a motion to reopen by 11/17/2016. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/18/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER holding in abeyance ruling on Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk is directed to mail a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form to Plaintiff with this Order. Plaintiff shall complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this Order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file it within thirty days of the date of this Order. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/12/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
