Harrison v. New et al
| Ashleigh Harrison |
| Bobby New and Justin Kimble |
| 3:2016cv00240 |
| September 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Poinsett |
| James M. Moody |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 4 Order, Judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/2/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's 2 Complaint for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5 (c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/1/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS. Denying 1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail plaintiff an IFP application along with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff must return the completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/27/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
