Gray v. Hall et al
Plaintiff: Rubby James Gray
Defendant: Matt Hall, Jefferson and J Hall
Case Number: 3:2016cv00288
Filed: October 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Craighead
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Presiding Judge: Joe J. Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 JUDGMENT consistent with the Order entered on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Rubby James Gray's complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/18/2017. (jak)
June 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order and the 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendation to Mr. Gray at the return address listed on the envelope that contained the letter of 2/21/2017, 23 . The Court extends the time for Mr . Gray to file an objection to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations up to and including 7/7/2017. For good cause shown, the Court grants Mr. Halls motion (Dkt. No. 25 ). The Court will hold in abeyance the dispositive motions deadline and all other deadlines in effect pending the Court's ruling on the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in this action. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/6/2017. (jak)
December 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff Rubby James Gray's claims against separate defendants Matt Hall and Officer Jefferson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/6/2016. (jak)
November 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 5.5 within 30 days of the entry of this Order or a recommendation of dismissal will be entered in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/8/2016. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Hall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rubby James Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Hall
Represented By: Thomas J. Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?