Johnson et al v. Arkansas State University et al
Ryan Anthony Johnson |
Arkansas State University, Charles L Welch, Tim Hudson, Lynita Cooksey, William R Stripling and Richard Burns |
3:2017cv00093 |
April 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Craighead |
Beth Deere |
James M. Moody |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 JUDGMENT consistent with the Order entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Mr. Johnson's claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and his claim for breach of contract is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/6/2017. (jak) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting 1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare summonses for the Defendants, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summonses, copies of the complaint, and this Order on Charles L. Welch, Lynita Cooksey, William R. Stripling, and Richard Burns at Arkansas State University, 2105 Aggie Road, Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401; and on Tim Hudson, at Austin Peay State University, 601 College Street, Clarksville, Tennessee 37044, without prepayment of fees and costs. Mr. Johnson's 3 motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 5/5/2017. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.