Obregon v. Capital Quarries Company Inc
| Carlo W Obregon |
| Capital Quarries Company Inc |
| 3:2017cv00156 |
| June 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Randolph |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER denying 67 Motion to alter or amend the Judgment. The Court has reconsidered; but they haven't offered newly discovered evidence; and the Court doesn't see a manifest error of law. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/6/2020. (jak)
|
|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT: All claims against Farmer Holding Company, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. All of Obregon's and Waters's federal law claims are dismissed with prejudice. All their state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/20/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying without prejudice 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Amended complaint due by 2/1/2019. Obregon must expedite receipt of Waters's right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. An amended Final Scheduling Order will issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/18/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: The Court thanks the parties for their concise joint report, 21 . Discovery dispute resolved. No hearing is needed, call the Court mid-deposition if another dispute arises, notwithstanding best efforts to be collegial. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/20/218. (jak)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: The Court received the attached letter from Obregon's attorney. The Court notes and appreciates the status report. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/28/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 6 Motion with a caveat. Obregon's claims against Farmer Holding Company Inc. are therefore dismissed without prejudice. Obregon, though, may explore Capital Quarries Company, Inc.'s relationships in discovery. And if a rel ated entity was involved in the alleged discrimination, then Obregon should file a timely motion to amend with a proposed amended complaint (changes in redline). The amended complaint must give particulars on any involvement and on why this Court has personal jurisdiction. The deadline for a motion to amend will be in the Court's final scheduling order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/4/2017. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Obregon v. Capital Quarries Company Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlo W Obregon | |
| Represented By: | Larry J. Steele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital Quarries Company Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
