Bowen v. Ring et al
Andrew Bowen |
Matthew Ring, Greene County, Arkansas, Greene County Sheriff's Department, Greene County Detention Center, David Carter and John Does |
3:2017cv00214 |
August 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Greene |
D. P. Marshall |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 JUDGMENT: Bowen's first amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until 5/10/2019 to enforce the parties' settlement. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/10/2019. (jak) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Joint motion. The 22 Protective Order is amended to include the agreed provisions contained within this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/3/2018. (jak) |
Filing 22 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/18/2017. (jak) |
Filing 21 ORDER: The Court appreciates the parties' concise proposed protective order. Please make the noted changes, send the revised order to chambers, and the Court will sign it. 20 Motion granted as modified. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/7/2017. (jak) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting 9 Motion. Greene County is a defendant. The Sheriff's Department and the Detention Center are arms of the County, which don't need to be named as separate parties. They are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/22/2017. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.