Pierce v. Rorax et al
Jason Lloyd Pierce |
Steve Rorax, Becky Hitt and Susan Cox |
3:2017cv00268 |
October 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Poinsett |
D. P. Marshall |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/19/2018. (jak) |
Filing 20 ORDER directing Pierce to file a notice of his current mailing address, on or before 6/21/2018. If Pierce does not timely do so, his case will be dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 5/21/2018. (jak) |
Filing 12 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Rorax, Hitt, and Cox and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, Complaint, Amended Complaint, and 11 Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 3/28/2018. (jak) |
Filing 11 ORDER adopting 10 Recommendation. Pierce's official-capacity claims for damages are dismissed without prejudice. Pierce may proceed with his claims about inadequate medical care and failure to protect. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/27/2018. (jak) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing Pierce to file on or before 12/1/2017 a Second Amended Complaint containing the information specified in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/1/2017. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.