Neely v. Arkansas Department of Community Correction et al
| Kerry J Neely |
| Arkansas Department of Community Correction, Susan Francis, Sheila Sharp and John Does |
| 3:2017cv00282 |
| October 26, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Mississippi |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
JUDGMENT: The case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until 12/1/2020 to enforce the parties' settlement. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/31/2020. (jak)
|
Filing
54
ORDER: The Court will hold an in-person status conference at 1:30 p.m. on 7/2/2020 in Courtroom 324 in the Jonesboro Federal Building. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/25/2020. (jak)
|
Filing
52
ORDER directing the Clerk to update the docket to reflect Neely's contact information below, and mail this Order to Neely. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/9/2020. (jak)
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 Motion. Kevin Murphy is substituted as a party for Sheila Sharp. The Court directs the Clerk to update the docket. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/7/2018. (jak)
|
Filing
15
ORDER partly granting and partly denying 7 Motion. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/13/2018. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.