Bradley v. Crittenden County, Arkansas
| Lisa Bradley |
| Crittenden County, Arkansas |
| 3:2018cv00029 |
| February 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Arkansas |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until 12/31/2019 to enforce the parties' settlement. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/30/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER: The Court amends 89 : the Court refers this case to Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris to conduct a settlement conference on 7/23/2019. The rest of 89 stands. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/3/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER granting 88 joint motion. The Court refers the case to Magistrate Judge Thomas Ray to conduct a settlement conference. The Court also extends the discovery deadline to 7/16/2019 and the motions deadline to 8/19/2019. Joint report of discovery dispute 87 noted. The parties must file a joint status report within 2 business days after the settlement conference. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/28/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER addressing 84 Joint report of discovery dispute. The Court extends the discovery deadline to 5/17/2019 and the motions deadline to 6/20/2019. The October 2019 trial is canceled. A Second Amended Final Scheduling Order will issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/17/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 60 second motion to reconsider. The County should provide Bradley's lawyer each potential group member's e-mail address (if known), along with his or her name, home address, and telephone number. 51 Order amended. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/10/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 55 Motion. The opt-in period will close on 2/11/2019. 51 at 3 Order amended. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/28/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting as modified 14 Motion to certify. The County's 24 motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/5/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying without prejudice as premature 4 Motion. While discovery takes place, the Court tolls the statute of limitations, effective 6/11/2018. Agreed or proposed motion to conditionally certify due by 7/25/2018. Response due by 8/3/2018. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/11/2018. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradley v. Crittenden County, Arkansas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lisa Bradley | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Wesley Burks |
| Represented By: | Joshua Sanford |
| Represented By: | Sean Short |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crittenden County, Arkansas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
