Erwin v. Paragould Arkansas, City of et al
| David Erwin and John Does |
| Paragould Arkansas, City of, Billy Mcgraw and Arkansas State Police |
| 3:2018cv00073 |
| April 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 42 Motion to reconsider. The Court stands by its 8/19/2019 40 Order and 41 Judgment. The Court also construes 42 as a motion for leave to proceed in forma paupers on appeal, which is granted. The Court directs the Clerk to docket 42 as a notice of appeal. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/9/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT: Erwin's claims against Anthony Ganus, the City of Paragould, and its police officers are dismissed with prejudice. Erwin's claims against Billy McGraw and John Does 1-3 are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/19/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying without prejudice 31 Motion to appoint counsel. If this case needs a trial, the Court will appoint a lawyer to represent Erwin. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/13/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel. To the extent Erwin wants the Court's help in getting documents, that request is also denied without prejudice. Erwin must first seek documents from Gaines, pursuant to Rules of Civil Procedure, No. 15 at 2. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/9/2018. (jak)(Docket text modified on 11/9/2018 to correct a typographical error)(jak)
|
|
Filing
15
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/20/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER directing the Clerk's office to update the docket to show John Doe 4 is Anthony Gaines. The Court directs the Clerk to issue summons to Gaines and the U.S. Marshal must serve the summons and complaint on Gaines without charge. The Marshal must also provide Gaines a copy of Erwin's 11 Motion for reconsideration and his most recent 13 Notice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/6/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting as modified 10 Motion to reconsider. The Court reopens this case and vacates its 10 Judgment. The settlement with Paragould remains in force, as does the Court's dismissal without prejudice of Trooper McGraw. The official cap acity claims against Greene County Sheriff's Department are dismissed without prejudice. Erwin's complaint alleges unreasonable search and seizure. The Court construes these allegations as an individual-capacity claim against the unnamed d eputy sheriff who will be John Doe 4 for now. The Court directs the Clerk to update the docket. Erwin must provide a complete name and address for service as soon as he can, and no later than 7/27/2018. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/10/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
9
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/28/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 3 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Erwin is directed to provide addresses for the city and Trooper McGraw by 5/25/2018. Erwin doesn't know the names of the city officers so they will be John Does 1-3 for now. Erwin must provide their names, and their addresses for service, as soon as he can. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/3/2018. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
