Smith et al v. Armor Bank et al
| Eugene Smith, Elizabeth D Smith and Kiel D Smith |
| Big Creek Bancshares LLC, Armor Bank, Alex Morgan and Mark Waldrip |
| 3:2018cv00196 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 Motion for injunctive relief. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/10/2018. (jak)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Permanent Injunction and Restraining Order by Eugene Smith. (jak) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/3/2018. (cmn) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Smith's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claim; and denying as moot #3 Smith's motion for a lawyer. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/3/2018. (kdr)
|
| Filing 4 Letter to the Court filed by Eugene Smith. (ljb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eugene Smith. (jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Eugene Smith, Kiel D Smith, Elizabeth D Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eugene Smith. (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.