Burgess v. Social Security Administration
| Rickey L Burgess |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2018cv00223 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| D P Marshall |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/17/2019. (jak) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Furthermore, at counsels request and pursuant to Local Rule 83.5(d), the Court agrees to waive the requirement of Frederick J. Daley, Jr. to designate local counsel. Mr. Daley is admitted for the limited purpose of the pending litigation and shall perform in accordance with the Local Rules of the Eastern District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/03/2018.(lmc)
|
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees and cost or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/03/2018. (glr)
|
| Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Forwarded to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (kdr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #4 Filing Fee Received. CORRECTION: The original document contained an incorrect file mark date, based on a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to docket entry #4 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. The docket entry was modified to correct the file date to 11/21/2018. (thd) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee received $100.00, receipt number LIT069715 re #3 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. (fjg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2018: #1 Main Document - Correct, and docket entry modified to correct the file date.) (thd). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Frederick J. Daley Jr., filed by Rickey L Burgess. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Rickey L Burgess. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rickey L Burgess. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burgess v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rickey L Burgess | |
| Represented By: | Frederick J. Daley, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Stacey Elise McCord |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
