Adams v. CCDC et al
Plaintiff: Eugene Adams and CCDC
Defendant: Jade and Potar
Case Number: 3:2019cv00010
Filed: January 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Referring Judge: J Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eugene Adams re Notice of Docket Correction re #2 Initial Order. (fjg)
March 8, 2019 Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eugene Adams re #4 Order. (jbh)
March 4, 2019 Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eugene Adams re #1 Complaint. (llg)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to mail Adams a free-world Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and directing Adams, on or before 3/19/2019, to file a notice of his current mailing address and comply with the Court's 2/6/2019 Order by either paying the $400 filing fee for this action, or filing a free-world Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/19/2019. (cmn)
February 15, 2019 Filing 3 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eugene Adams re #2 Order. (llg)
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS finding service is not appropriate at this time; directing the Plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee or file an IFP motion on or before 3/6/2019; and directing the Clerk to send an IFP application along with an institutional trust fund account statement to the Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/6/2019. (jbh)(Docket text modified on 2/6/2019 to correct the description of the document filed)(jak)
February 6, 2019 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Initial Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS finding service is not appropriate at this time; directing the Plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee or file an IFP motion on or before 3/6/2019; and directing the Clerk to send an IFP application along with an institutional trust fund account statement to the Plaintiff" as marked on the document. (jak)
January 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Eugene Adams. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. CCDC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CCDC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Potar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?