Razor et al v. Thompson Industrial Services LLC
Robert Moore, Van Razor and Shauncy Perry |
Thompson Industrial Services LLC |
3:2019cv00136 |
May 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Certify Class (Joint Motion for Conditional Certification of FLSA Collective Action and Request for Issuance of Notice to Putative Opt-In Plaintiffs) by Thompson Industrial Services LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Notice, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Consent Form)(Washko, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Thompson Industrial Services LLC (Washko, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth S. Washko on behalf of Thompson Industrial Services LLC (Washko, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Thompson Industrial Services LLC.(Washko, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Robert Moore, Shauncy Perry, Van Razor Consent to Join Collective Action - - Phillip Stokes (Burks, Christopher) |
Filing 1 CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT against Thompson Industrial Services LLC., filed by Van Razor, Robert Moore, and Shauncy Perry. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT072049. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.