Redden v. Raymond et al
Plaintiff: Derrell Anthony Redden
Defendant: T Raymond, Brown, Marty Boyd and Keith Bowers
Case Number: 3:2019cv00163
Filed: June 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Patricia S Harris
Referring Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Marty Boyd served on 7/20/2019. (fjg)
July 26, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. T Raymond served on 7/20/2019. (fjg)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court does not assess an initial partial filing fee. Redden's custodian is directed to collect monthly payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and forward them to the Clerk of Court until the total $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the Craighead County Sheriff. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the #1 Complaint and summons on defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/2/2019. (jak)
July 2, 2019 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Forwarded to USMS for service. (kdr)
June 21, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Derrell Anthony Redden. (llg)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS. Directing the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff an IFP application along with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff is directed to return a completed IFP application or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/6/2019. (jak)
June 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Derrell Anthony Redden.(kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redden v. Raymond et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrell Anthony Redden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Raymond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marty Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?