Amy Logistics LLC v. Great West Casualty Company
| Amy Logistics LLC |
| Great West Casualty Company |
| 3:2019cv00166 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT: The amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until 7/31/2019 to enforce the parties settlement. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/1/2019. (jak) |
Filing 11
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: The parties have settled. No. #10 . Congratulations. The Court will dismiss and retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the settlement. Motion to dismiss, No. #3 , denied without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/1/2019. (jak)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Great West Casualty Company (Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by Amy Logistics LLC. (Elmore, Phillip) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Amy Logistics LLC(Elmore, Phillip) |
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Motion, No. #6 , granted. Mr. Zachary A. Kisber is admitted pro hac vice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/17/2019. (slb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Zachary A. Kisber. Fee $100 receipt number 0860-3478539. Filed by Great West Casualty Company (Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT FILED: $400.00, receipt number LIT072555. (Original receipt mailed.) (rmg) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM re #3 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by Great West Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Commercial Lines Policy)(Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Great West Casualty Company (Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment & Damages with Jury Demand against Great West Casualty Company, filed by Amy Logistics LLC.(jak) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Great West Casualty Company from Mississippi County Circuit Court, case number 470cv-19-43. (Fee of $400 received) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Amy Logistics LLC v. Great West Casualty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Logistics LLC | |
| Represented By: | Phillip Anthony Elmore |
| Represented By: | Vincent O. Chadick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Great West Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | Robert F. Tom |
| Represented By: | Zachary A. Kisber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
