Gann v. Anderson et al
| Caroline Sue Gann |
| Amber Nicole Anderson and Adam Gregory Anderson |
| 3:2019cv00200 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT: Gann's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/27/2019. (jak) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing the complaint without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/27/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Gann must submit a completed application and certified calculation sheet by 8/26/2019. The Court directs the Clerk to mail Gann an in forma pauperis application with a copy of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/24/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/22/2019. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Caroline Sue Gann. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Caroline Sue Gann. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
