Nixon v. Moulder et al
| Ronnie Nixon |
| Susan Cox and Kevin Moulder |
| 3:2019cv00203 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to the Court by Ronnie Nixon. (jak) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Ronnie Nixon. (jak) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronnie Nixon. (jak) |
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS court records show plaintiff is a three-striker and can only proceed IFP if he is currently in imminent danger of serious physical harm; plaintiff is directed to either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full; or (2) file a properly supported IFP motion and file an Amended Complaint explaining how he is currently in imminent danger of serious physical injury; the Clerk is directed to send you an (1) IFP application with an institutional trust fund account statement and (2) a blank 1983 Complaint form labeled "Amended Complaint". Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/24/19. (tjb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ronnie Nixon. (Filing fee not submitted, Motion to proceed IFP not filed)(jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
