Akins v. S & R Development Inc et al
| Michael Anthony Akins and Michael Anthony Akins doing business as ABC Construction Company |
| S & R Development Inc, Lamar Fox and Hiren Patel |
| 3:2019cv00226 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael Anthony Akins re #3 Order. (fjg) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court dismisses without prejudice Akins's claim that S & R committed the tort of outrage. He hasn't alleged emotional distress. The Court directs the Clerk to prepare summonses for the defendants using the addresses provided by Akins. And the Court directs the U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of Arkansas to serve the summonses and complaint without prepayment of fees. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/25/2019. (jak)
|
| Summons Issued as to Lamar Fox, Hiren Patel, and S & R Development Inc. Forward to USMS for service. (ajt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michael Anthony Akins.(jak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Anthony Akins. (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
