Stowers v. Arkansas, State of et al
| Gene Stowers |
| Kristyn Watts, Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism, Mick Haven and Arkansas, State of |
| 3:2019cv00238 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Returned to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (jak) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Stowers's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing without prejudice Stowers's constitutional claims; directing Stowers's lawyers to prepare summonses, which the Clerk will issue, for Haven and Watts; directing Counsel to deliver process to the U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of Arkansas; and directing the Marshal to serve the summonses and complaint without prepayment of fees. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/8/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER pursuant to General Order 29 provisionally granting the application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 8/26/2019. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Gene Stowers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gene Stowers. (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
