Ming v. Autobahn Freight Lines LTD et al
Plaintiff: Keith Ming
Defendant: Surjit Bhatia, John Doe, Autobahn Freight Lines LTD and Doe Corporation
Case Number: 3:2019cv00269
Filed: September 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Referring Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 9 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to instructions from the Court, this case is transferred to the docket of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/15/2019.(jak)
November 8, 2019 Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 12/20/2019. Jury Trial set for 9/13/2021 at 9:30 AM in Jonesboro Courtroom (large) #324 before Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 11/8/2019. (slb)
November 7, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Surjit Bhatia.(Wyatt, Carl)
November 7, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Carl K. Wyatt, Jr on behalf of Surjit Bhatia (Wyatt, Carl)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 RECEIPT FILED: $400, receipt number LIT074228 (bmd)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Autobahn Freight Lines LTD (Wyatt, Carl)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Autobahn Freight Lines LTD.(Wyatt, Carl)
September 30, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Keith Ming.(jak)
September 30, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Autobahn Freight Lines LTD from Crittenden County Circuit Court, case number CV-2019-641. (Fee of $400 received) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ming v. Autobahn Freight Lines LTD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Surjit Bhatia
Represented By: Carl K. Wyatt, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Autobahn Freight Lines LTD
Represented By: Carl K. Wyatt, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Ming
Represented By: William Ray Nickle
Represented By: William Jennings Stanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?