Troutt v. Kate
Plaintiff: Justin Troutt
Defendant: Lowen Kate
Case Number: 3:2019cv00316
Filed: November 6, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Beth Deere
Referring Judge: D P Marshall
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #7 Judgment. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #7 and is attached hereto for service on the parties. (jak)
December 10, 2019 Filing 8 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak)
December 10, 2019 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: Troutt's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/10/2019. (jak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/10/2019: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER dismissing Troutt's complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The #4 pending recommendation is declined as moot. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/10/2019. (jak)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court would appreciate plaintiff filing a notice by 11/18/2019 about whether the plaintiff in this case is related to my former clients in regards to a possible recusal issue. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/8/2019. (jak)
November 7, 2019 Filing 4 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that Mr. Troutt's claims be DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Court further recommends that this dismissal constitute a "strike" for purposes of 42 U.S.C. 1915(g) and that Judge Marshall certify that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith. Objections due within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/7/2019. (csf)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS. Granting #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's present custodian is directed to collect the initial partial fee of $28.59 from his prison trust account and forward this along with future monthly payments to the Clerk of Court until the total $350 is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Division, and the Warden of the Greene County Detention Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/7/2019. (jak)
November 6, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Lowen Kate filed by Justin Troutt. (ljb)
November 6, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Troutt. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Troutt v. Kate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lowen Kate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Troutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?