Miller v. Molder et al
Christopher Miller |
Kevin Molder, Steve Roex, Trish Marshall and Doyle Ramey |
3:2019cv00318 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
J Thomas Ray |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Christopher Miller. (cmn) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Miller, Doyle Ramey.(jak) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to mail Miller a 1983 complaint form that is labeled Amended Complaint. Miller must file within 30 days of the date of this Order, an Amended Complaint that complies with the instructions in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/18/2019. (jak) |
Filing 3 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to instructions from the Court, this case is transferred to the docket of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/15/2019 (jak) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Miller.(wbb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Miller. (wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.