Phillips v. Crisp Contractors
| Nacy Phillips |
| Crisp Contractors |
| 3:2019cv00319 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Crisp Contractors (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Crisp Contractors.(Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon W. Lacy on behalf of Crisp Contractors (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Crisp Contractors served on 12/2/2019. (ajt) |
Filing 8
ORDER denying #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, without prejudice. If at any time the Court finds Petitioner unable to present her claims adequately, it will reconsider the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/20/2019. (lmc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #6 Order. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office (incorrect spelling of Plaintiff's name). The correct document was added to docket entry #6 and is attached hereto for service on the parties.(jak) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to issue the summons as to Plaintiff's claim and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and summons on the Defendant without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Plaintiff's #3 Motion for appointment of counsel is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney for decision, and if appropriate, appointment of counsel. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/19/2019. (jak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/19/2019: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
|
| Summons Issued as to Crisp Contractors. And forwarded to USMS for service. (ajt) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of EEOC documentation by Nacy Phillips. (jak) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Pursuant to General Order No. 29 provisionally granting #1 Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed at the direction of the Court on 11/08/19. (wbb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Nacy Phillips. (wbb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 against Crisp Contractors, filed by Nacy Phillips.(wbb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nacy Phillips. (wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Phillips v. Crisp Contractors | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crisp Contractors | |
| Represented By: | Brandon W. Lacy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nacy Phillips | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
