Sons v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
Gregory Michael Sons |
Doe, Craighead County Detention Center and Anthony Carter |
3:2019cv00341 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE to the Court by Gregory Michael Sons. (kdr) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gregory Michael Sons. (kdr) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Gregory Michael Sons. (ljb) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS plaintiff is directed to pay the $400.00 filing fee of file an IFP motion by 12/26/19; the Clerk is directed to send you an IFP application along with an institutional trust fund account statement; plaintiff is directed to inform the Court by 12/26/19, whether, at the time he filed his Complaint, he was :(a) a pretrial detainee (in jail and still awaiting trial on pending criminal charges); (b) serving a sentence as a result of a judgment of conviction; or (c) in jail for other reasons (for example, an alleged probation violation) #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/25/19. (tjb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Gregory Michael Sons. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.