In Re Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts
| Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts |
| 3:2019cv00346 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Northern Division Office |
| D P Marshall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Status report #2 noted. The Court appreciates the update about the possible need to amend the Trusts' previous tax returns, and about the estate tax return due to this March. Further report on amendments, appraisals, and the estate tax return due by 3/13/2020. Perkins's request for attorney's fees, #2 at 4 is granted. He and Wood may pay Perkins's firm $9,951.68 in attorney's fees and costs. For the co-trustees' information, the current amount in the Court's registry is $262,409.86. The Court directs the Clerk to transfer all registry funds from 3:17-cv-00226 DPM, the former lead case, into the Court's registry for this case. Petition to have the Trust construed and the beneficiaries declared due by 4/30/2020. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/21/2020. (jak)
|
|
Filing 2
STATUS REPORT Status Report and Payment of Fees by Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Linder Management Report October 2019, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Linder Management Report November 2019, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Regions Statement November 2019, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Regions Statement December 2019, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Perkins Firm Statement through December 2019)(Perkins, G.S.)
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER: Status report 322 appreciated. The Court appreciates the good progress on notice to qualified beneficiaries and interested parties. Report on service of the rest of them due by 1/6/2020. The Court appreciates the monthly reports from Linder & Associates. Further monthly reports due 1/6/2020. 322 Request for attorney's fees granted. 323 Motion for attorney's fees granted. The Court directs the Clerk to file this Order in this case and 3:17-cv-227; administratively close 3:17-cv-227; open a new case, styled In re Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts; mark 3:17-cv-226 and 3:17-cv-227 as cases related to the new one; and associate the following attorneys with the new case: Elan Darvish, Martin Emmett Lilly, and G.S. Brant Perkins. Key orders from those two cases will be available as landmarks as needed in the new case. All new entries must be filed under the new case and docket number. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/2/2019. [Docketed pursuant to Court Order 324 in case No. 3:17-cv-00226 DPM directing the Clerk's office to open a new case](jak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts | |
| Represented By: | Elan Darvish |
| Represented By: | Martin Emmett Lilly |
| Represented By: | G.S. Brant Perkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
