Wofford v. Roax et al
Terry R Wofford |
Steve Roax and Ptrisha Marshall |
3:2020cv00026 |
January 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of Signature Page from Complaint by Terry R Wofford. (kdr) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing plaintiff's custodian to collect an initial partial filing fee of $4.60 from his institutional account and to send it to the Clerk; the Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Poinsett County Detention Center; the Clerk is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of the signature page from his Complaint; plaintiff is directed to sign the signature page where indicated and to file it with the Clerk within 30 days of the date of this Order; if plaintiff does not fully and timely comply with these instructions his case will be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 1/29/20. (tjb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Terry R Wofford.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry R Wofford. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.