Atherton v. Monsanto Company et al
Charles Atherton |
John Does and Monsanto Company |
3:2020cv00027 |
January 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 E-MAIL received from U.S. District Court Northern District of California, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 3:20-cv-01067. (jak) |
Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-185) transferring this case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as part of MDL No. 2741 In Re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 2/10/2020. (jak) |
Docket Note: Pursuant to #4 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-185), this case was transferred to the U.S. District Court Northern District of California as part of MDL No. 2741 on this date. (jak) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint , filed by Charles Atherton. Monsanto Company served on 1/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A & B)(Ludwig, Kyle) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT as to Unknown Tortfeasors by Charles Atherton. (ajt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Charles Atherton. (Fee $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT075768.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.