Ray v. Arkansas, State of et al
Stephen D Ray |
Mark Counts, Serena Martin, Arkansas Supreme Court, Ryan Cooper, Joe Grider, III, Arkansas, State of, Harold Erwin, Michelle Huff and Henry Boyce |
3:2020cv00203 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Joe J Volpe |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that #1 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice and the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommendation and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/31/2020. (jak) |
Filing 2 ORDER that Plaintiff must submit either the $400 filing fee or a complete Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do one or the other will result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit along with a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 7/27/2020. (lej) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Stephen D Ray.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.