Moore v. Franks et al
David P Moore, Sr |
Brent Cox and Steve Franks |
3:2020cv00250 |
August 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
J Thomas Ray |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by David P Moore, Sr. (cmn) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time by David P Moore, Sr (tjb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David P Moore, Sr. (ljb) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice; the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff another IFP application (AO 240), along with two copies of this Order; plaintiff must: (1) complete and sign the IFP application; (2) have an authorized jail official complete and sign the institutional account certificate and calculation sheet; and (3) return all forms to the Clerk by 10/9/20; failure to do so will cause plaintiff's case to be dismissed without prejudice; plaintiff has been provided with an extra copy of this Order to give to jail officials; jail officials are directed to assist you in completing the necessary forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/9/20. (tjb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by David P Moore, Sr. (llg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David P Moore, Sr. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.