Barber v. Baker et al
Darren Barber |
Gary Musselwhite, Clinton Baker and Dexter Payne |
3:2020cv00336 |
October 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that #2 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal of this case should be counted as a "strike" and an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections due 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/3/2020. (jak) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiff's custodian is directed to collect monthly payments equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's account, if the balance exceeds $10.00; the Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Grimes Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/23/20. (tjb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Darren Barber. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darren Barber. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.