King v. Massey et al
Plaintiff: Michael James King
Defendant: Felicia Rolland, Dane Barnum, Morgan Robinson and Wesley Massey
Case Number: 3:2020cv00415
Filed: December 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Beth Deere
Referring Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE to the Court regarding Current Address by Michael James King. (kdr)
February 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: If Defendants intend to pursue a defense that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit, it must be raised by motion for summary judgment no later than March 1, 2021. Discovery is stayed until the exhaustion issue is decided. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/3/2021. (csf)
February 3, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (csf)
February 2, 2021 Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Wesley Massey served on 1/11/2021. (bmd)
January 28, 2021 Filing 16 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Dane Barnum, Wesley Massey, Morgan Robinson, Felicia Rolland.(Thomas, JaNan)
January 28, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by JaNan Arnold Thomas on behalf of Dane Barnum, Wesley Massey, Morgan Robinson, Felicia Rolland (Thomas, JaNan)
January 27, 2021 Filing 14 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael James King re #8 Order. (fjg)
January 26, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Dane Barnum served on 1/13/2021. (bmd)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER directing Mr. King to notify the Court of his current address within 30 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/26/2021. (jbh)
January 26, 2021 Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael James King re #7 Request for Production of Documents. (jbh)
January 25, 2021 Filing 10 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael James King re #5 Motion, #6 Motion. (jbh)
January 13, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Felicia Rolland served on 1/8/2021. (bmd)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying #6 Motion to Depose Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/12/2021. (csf)
January 7, 2021 Filing 7 FIRST REQUEST for Production of Documents by Michael James King.(kdr)
January 7, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave of Court to Depose Defendants by Michael James King. (kdr)
January 7, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael James King. (kdr)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summonses for the Defendants; and the Marshal is directed to serve the Defendants with summonses and copies of the #2 complaint, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 12/30/2020. (wbb)
December 30, 2020 Summons Issued as to Dane Barnum, Wesley Massey, Morgan Robinson, Felicia Rolland and forwarded to USMS for service. (ajt)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Division, and the Warden of the Greene County Detention Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 12/29/2020. (jbh)
December 18, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Michael James King.(kdr)
December 18, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael James King. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Massey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Felicia Rolland
Represented By: JaNan Arnold Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dane Barnum
Represented By: JaNan Arnold Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Morgan Robinson
Represented By: JaNan Arnold Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wesley Massey
Represented By: JaNan Arnold Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael James King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?